- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:15:32 -0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
"Simon White" <simon.white@jkd.co.uk> wrote in message news:FDFC0668A850D246BC4231715D94904E0CD594@uranus.jkd.co.uk... > >We used a server-side script to allow users with no JS to >access the page. If no JS was available and another link >was required (to HTML version without pop-up) this was >offered as a redundant text link as the original pop-up info >was available from near the bottom of the page in the main >navigation. It's not robust in the face of window.open disabled, or script being enabled/disabled on a "page by page" basis, if it mattered that people saw the disclaimer, I'd not be happy with those constraints. window.open is blocked (but not other javascript) by a lot of products, and a lot of people. Jim.
Received on Friday, 18 October 2002 14:17:06 UTC