- From: Steve Vosloo <stevenvosloo@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:26:53 +0200
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
If we can't use the invisible chars to separate links with more than whitespace, what can we do? Steve -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Julian Sent: 10 August 2002 12:59 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: whitespace, navigation links, styled divs > For a truly CSS compliant renderer, that is the same as if the span > element didn't exist at all. ..and for users with both a truly css compliant browser and a screenreader the span wouldn't appear and the links would run together. Good point David and I shall stop doing it. >I think you are abusing display:none to > take advantage of bugs in it's implemnetation, What's wrong with that? In principle I mean, not in relation to this particular example which I concede is bad practice. Julian ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 10:05 PM Subject: Re: whitespace, navigation links, styled divs > > > I have done something similar to that; put a "." in a span after > > each link > > and style it to display:none. I don't think this causes any problems > > for > > For a truly CSS compliant renderer, that is the same as if the span > element didn't exist at all. I think you are abusing display:none to > take advantage of bugs in it's implemnetation, or a correlation > between browser that don't distinguish adjacent links and ones that > don't support CSS2. >
Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 15:24:45 UTC