- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:19:54 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Steven McCaffrey <SMCCAFFR@MAIL.NYSED.GOV>
- cc: WAI IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Well, I think you had two questions. The WCAG one is fair game for this list.
(Actually I think that part of it is an important question for this list and
the WCAG group). Interpreting laws is a whole different ball game, and while
it is a valid question there are better places to get the best answers.
I don't think you need to phrase it in terms of WCAG specifically, although I
tend to do that by instinct if I think that WCAG covers something well enough
and also if I think that a question reveals a problem in using WCAG. Phrasing
them in terms of accessibility impact is a good thing though.
Cheers
Charles
On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Steven McCaffrey wrote:
Hi Charles:
Thanks, you are probably right, sorry about going off topic. I should have phrased my question the way you did in terms of WCAG checkpoint 11.4.
Steve
Steve McCaffrey
ITS
NYSED
Received on Friday, 10 August 2001 09:19:54 UTC