- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 20:07:24 -0800
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: "Charles F. Munat" <chas@munat.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
At 07:56 PM 2/5/2001 , Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >As I have argued above, the specification may be deficient, but the element >is potentially very useful. Well, that's the point on which we all agree, so nothing more from me on this topic -- I think we (or the PF group) should refer this back to the HTML Working Group and ask them to correct the problem they have generated, either by issuing an errata for HTML 4.01, or by updating the elements in XHTML 2.0, or maybe both. Until then, well, do whatever you like. (I know _I_ certainly don't give a damn -- this really is "tag trivia" and I should have known better.) --Kynn Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> Technical Developer Liaison Customer Management/Team Edapta Reef North America Tel +1 909-674-5225 ___________________________________ BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. ___________________________________ http://www.reef.com
Received on Monday, 5 February 2001 23:05:04 UTC