- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 18:13:27 -0500 (EST)
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
This is a legitimate concern. But the tools I have seen generate SVG are capable of doing "the right thing", and most make that easier than doing "the wrong thing". (This is not the case with all tools using CSS positioning with HTML.) cheers Charles On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, David Woolley wrote: > > (3) Use of CSS-P (positioning CSS) which does not linearize well > > CSS-P (part of CSS level 2) is actually worse than tables > when it comes to linearization problems; the ability of CSS > to be drawn from ANYWHERE and to overlay other elements This is one of the main reasons that I'm concerned about the use of SVG by the average web page author. Unless they had craft it, it is very likely that the linearised order will be the order in which the page was written, which, in many cases, may be far from the logical reading order. -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia until 6 January 2001 at: W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Sunday, 21 January 2001 18:13:30 UTC