- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 14:39:54 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> easy (at least for an automated tool). Happily, there is a very high > correlation between accessibility and validity (at least with HTML 4 and > latter), so I would gladly settle for that. Unfortunately, I think the correlation is because people who care about validity tend to care about accessibility. Whilst it will make it easier to write non-visual automated tools and may just make the developer's marketing people think about the real nature of HTML, I don't think that machine generated valid HTML will correlate as strongly as valid HTML generated because the user knows how to do it.
Received on Saturday, 20 January 2001 10:17:44 UTC