- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2000 14:41:10 -0400
- To: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, jonathan chetwynd <jc@signbrowser.org.uk>
At 12:08 PM 2000-09-02 -0400, David Poehlman wrote: >this was somewhat my point but when reading media, we usually refer to >it as assimilation of text? To put it another way, how can an animation >be read aloud? you can describe it outloud, but that is not the same as >a one to one correspondence as with text. I do not miss the point here >though that strides towards higher comprehention and interaction are >being made. I know you understand, and I count on it. This is what in the literature on leadership is termed 'vision' -- the ability to think in terms of what is possible but not obvious. Please pardon the pedantry of my next [following] blast. It could have been summed up in terms of thinking of the scenario of reading a children's book to a young child. The person reading the book ususally both voices the text and talks about the pictures. But at a summary level, at the level of aggregation of the whole book, we still refer to this as "reading the book." Al
Received on Saturday, 2 September 2000 14:26:55 UTC