- From: Dave J Woolley <DJW@bts.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 11:57:05 +0100
- To: "'w3c-wai-ig@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> From: Waddell, Cynthia [SMTP:cynthia.waddell@ci.sj.ca.us] > > It is not necessarily true that a person who is blind or has low vision > would require assistance in completing a form. If you noted the Section > 508 > proposed rule, an online form designed to be accessible would enable > someone > using a screenreader to fill out the form. > [DJW:] I don't see that this is particular incompatible with PDF. In fact PDF text is more likely to be real text than the text on typical commercial web pages. The only real problem with the text in PDF files is it is often produced by word processors that think they can do a better job of spacing characters than PostScript can do. That means that you normally get individually placed characters, rather than whole words with a horzontal stretch factor, as allowed by the PDF primitives. This can confuse tools that try to extract words from the text (I predict that the same problem will happen with SVG if, as I suspect, people use it for whole pages, not just graphics). (It seems to me that there is a place for tools to help marginally reformat PDF to take out the detailed microspacing and replace it by stretch factors. It's possible they are already in the commercial Acrobat toolset.) PDF does have a fill the forms facility, even in the version before last of Acrobat, and you can print the result. This is not an ideal example from a size or accessibility point of view, but it does demonstrate the feature - it needs the latest Acrobat reader: http://planetary.org/UPDATES/seti/seti@home_certificate1.pdf (please destroy any printout if you are not a participant!). Once you impose a constraint that the layout should exactly match that of the printed form, I think PDF becomes the format of choice. -- --------------------------- DISCLAIMER --------------------------------- Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2000 06:56:54 UTC