- From: Paul Bohman <paulb@cpd2.usu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 15:20:44 -0700
- To: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> Paul, I'd like to applaud you for a sensible approach to the web > accessibility policy issue [...] Thank you for the support. > Priority 1s are must-haves, but every organization should carefully > consider the P2s and the P3s as well. Paul, did Utah State look at > any of the P3s [...] Yes and no. As the list of U.S.U. web accessibility requirements grew (from Priority 1 to most of Priority 2), I wanted to make sure that I wasn't pushing my luck within the group. As of yet, I have not formally recommended any of the Priority 3 checkpoints. Luckily, I am the one drafting the policy and I have some freedom with regard to its wording and criteria. The policy is due for official review next week, and, in accordance with your suggestion, I will revisit the Priority 3 guidelines. You mentioned the language attribute. Which other checkpoints from Priority 3 would you recommend as system-wide requirements? I open this question up to the group (...keeping in mind that one of my goals is to not instigate a major backlash from existing webmasters that would frustrate my efforts). Paul Bohman Technology Specialist Web Accessibility in Mind Utah State University
Received on Monday, 22 November 1999 17:21:00 UTC