- From: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 15:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
- To: charles@w3.org, phoenixl@netcom.com
- Cc: kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi, Charles Some people on campus want to be on the cutting edge while still being accessible. Javascript and dynamic HTML seem interesting ways to explain some complicated ideas by using interaction. It has come up in long-distance learning. A question is why should all browsers be supported. Why shouldn't students just be told that the class will be using one or two particular browsers? (I know of corporations which designate one browser as the corporate browser and the web pages on the corporate intranet are built around that browser.) Scott > I know of contracts being written that say "WCAG double-A" or "WCAG triple-A" > as a condition of the contract. As Jonathan, Anne and others have pointed out > illustration and graphics are important (although these are often required > anyway, and for many designers the challenge is to do them accessibly). Even > requiring WCAG level-A in a contract is a start. > > If you have experience in applying these contracts, then you may be able to > produce valuable feedback for the guidelines group (email to > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org is archived at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl if you want to see what they > have got). > > Cheers > > Charles McCN
Received on Saturday, 23 October 1999 18:20:48 UTC