W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: Web Accessibility Myths and The Kynn Challenge (was:

From: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 15:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199910232220.PAA23963@netcom6.netcom.com>
To: charles@w3.org, phoenixl@netcom.com
Cc: kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hi, Charles

Some people on campus want to be on the cutting edge while still being
accessible.  Javascript and dynamic HTML seem interesting ways to
explain some complicated ideas by using interaction.  It has come up in
long-distance learning.  A question is why should all browsers be
supported.  Why shouldn't students just be told that the class will be
using one or two particular browsers?  (I know of corporations which
designate one browser as the corporate browser and the web pages
on the corporate intranet are built around that browser.)


> I know of contracts being written that say "WCAG double-A" or "WCAG triple-A"
> as a condition of the contract. As Jonathan, Anne and others have pointed out
> illustration and graphics are important (although these are often required
> anyway, and for many designers the challenge is to do them accessibly). Even
> requiring WCAG level-A in a contract is a start.
> If you have experience in applying these contracts, then you may be able to
> produce valuable feedback for the guidelines group (email to
> w3c-wai-gl@w3.org is archived at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl if you want to see what they
> have got).
> Cheers
> Charles McCN
Received on Saturday, 23 October 1999 18:20:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:06 UTC