W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: Web Accessibility Myths and The Kynn Challenge (was:

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:43:57 -0400 (EDT)
To: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
cc: kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.9910231735480.26305-100000@tux.w3.org>
I know of contracts being written that say "WCAG double-A" or "WCAG triple-A"
as a condition of the contract. As Jonathan, Anne and others have pointed out
illustration and graphics are important (although these are often required
anyway, and for many designers the challenge is to do them accessibly). Even
requiring WCAG level-A in a contract is a start.

If you have experience in applying these contracts, then you may be able to
produce valuable feedback for the guidelines group (email to
w3c-wai-gl@w3.org is archived at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl if you want to see what they
have got).


Charles McCN

On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Scott Luebking wrote:

  Hi, Charles
  The current problem about including accessibility in a contract is
  what does "accessibility" mean in technology.
Received on Saturday, 23 October 1999 17:44:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:06 UTC