- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:43:57 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- cc: kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I know of contracts being written that say "WCAG double-A" or "WCAG triple-A" as a condition of the contract. As Jonathan, Anne and others have pointed out illustration and graphics are important (although these are often required anyway, and for many designers the challenge is to do them accessibly). Even requiring WCAG level-A in a contract is a start. If you have experience in applying these contracts, then you may be able to produce valuable feedback for the guidelines group (email to w3c-wai-gl@w3.org is archived at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl if you want to see what they have got). Cheers Charles McCN On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Scott Luebking wrote: Hi, Charles The current problem about including accessibility in a contract is what does "accessibility" mean in technology. Scott
Received on Saturday, 23 October 1999 17:44:01 UTC