- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 15:03:07 -0700
- To: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- Cc: phoenixl@netcom.com, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 02:55 PM 10/15/1999 , Scott Luebking wrote: >Unfortunately, I still need to demonstrate that the myth is false by >showing counter-examples before the web designer is given directions >about accessibility as a design consideration. By the way, are you really saying that unless other sites are proven accessible, your web designer won't create accessible web sites, despite the fact that anyone with the barest understanding of web accessibility can see, quite obviously, that accessible design will _not_ affect functionality and appearance? Is your designer just thick, or does she somehow have some sort of proof that accessible web design _will_ harm a site's appearance and functionality? It's very hard to fight at shadows, and in this case, the shadows are your web designer's ignorance and misconceptions. It's not enough for her to hear from people who actually do understand the subject that web accessibility is not harmful? I'm really at a loss as to what to say. The WCAG were released in May of this year, and it's been a VERY hard uphill battle, thanks to misinformation like those spread by your web designer, to get ANYONE to comply with them over the last 5 months. If people continue to demand "proof" such as this, then we may never actually get around to accessible web design being the standard! "Nobody else is doing it, why should I? I have no knowledge at all of the issues, but I'm SURE it would simply WRECK my design!" Why do you listen to that kind of argument? -- Kynn Bartlett mailto:kynn@hwg.org President, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org/ AWARE Center Director http://aware.hwg.org/
Received on Friday, 15 October 1999 18:07:54 UTC