- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:44:05 -0700
- To: love26@gorge.net
- Cc: Lovey@aol.com, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
At 10:34 AM 6/17/1999 , William Loughborough wrote: >There is no action being >taken, not because of indifference, but because we don't know >SPECIFICALLY what to do. William is making an important point here. The only reason that we can tell people to make pages accessible to, for example, blind people is that someone wrote down specific steps. We have the WCAG to refer to, and before that we had various other guidelines from Trace and elsewhere. If you tell web designers "make your pages accessible!" most of them will respond, and ask you "okay, how?" This is why we need nearly 100 checkpoints spelled out in almost excrutiating detail, with plenty of Techniques and examples. Lacking that, people will just think we're blowing smoke and will write us off. That's what we're seeing here, I think -- those of us who _don't_ have expertise in the subject would like those of us who _do_ to step forward and present concrete ideas. The substance of which could then be incorporated into highly detailed, structured form of Guidelines, Checkpoints, Techniques, and examples. At the very least, we'd like to see a "before" picture of an inaccessible page, and then an "after" picture that shows exactly what changes were necessary (and why) to improve the accessibility. In all this discussion, no concrete examples such as that have been provided. Is it too much to ask? -- Kynn Bartlett mailto:kynn@hwg.org President, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org/ AWARE Center Director http://aware.hwg.org/
Received on Thursday, 17 June 1999 13:51:35 UTC