- From: Chris Maden <crism@oreilly.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 16:29:58 -0400 (EDT)
- To: jay@peepo.com
- CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Jonathan, I looked at your site and couldn't make any sense of it, but I'm a very textual person (Lynx is my browser of choice). For contrast, my officemate is semi-agraphic; he usually only looks at the images on a page and skips past the text, leading to comprehension problems. He doesn't understand your site either. I don't think that the messages you forwarded were unsympathetic; I think they were trying to offer constructive criticism. It's possible that my officemate and I have too many preconceptions from the world of words. But I think that trying to address only the completely and totally illiterate is both missing the important realm of the semiliterate, and not providing a browsing path from illiteracy to to literacy. In addition, the rapid motion of the site is confusing; if the user's illiteracy is due in part to a comprehension problem, then the rapid speed is going to confuse them. I find the effort to address comprehension of the Web by illiterates to be an interesting and worthwhile one, but one that's much, much harder than accessibility of the Web by the blind, deaf, or motion-impaired. Please don't quit, but don't assume that everyone who doesn't fall in love with your site is hostile to your cause. -Chris -- <!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN"> <!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN" "<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487 <USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>
Received on Monday, 7 June 1999 16:30:07 UTC