- From: Jamie Fox <jfox@fenix2.dol-esa.gov>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 18:18:56 -0500
- To: "Joe Night" <joe.night@gateway2000.com>
- Cc: "'Web Accessibility Initiative'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I'd use Netscape 3.x and 4.x, a version of MS Internet Explorer (as you can't have two versions on the same machine to my knowledge), a text browser such as lynx., PwWebSpeak for the voice browser and maybe Opera if you have extra time and money. Also to be considered is the use of a general screen reader such as Jaws For Windows. Use of tools such as bobby and HTML validators is also essential. It might be sensible to have disabled users actually do the testing. See also: http://www.eeicom.com/dcwebmasters/pwd/ http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Grid/5447/access.html (not yet refined) -Jamie Fox -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Joe Night Sent: Monday, November 23, 1998 6:06 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Usability testing I need to help assemble and populate a small computer lab to examine web usability issues. This is a very large ballpark and I need to narrow the options we're going to explore. I'm seeking your opinion about what tools we should test with. We have to start someplace and picking a specific set of tools seems to be a reasonable place. I gather that there's no such thing as a perfect list but I need to put one together anyway. I'd like to hear about your opinions and preferences about tools if you care to share them. I suspect a public forum is not the best place to share these sentiments. Please respond privately so I don't get shot for starting another browser war. Regards, Joe Night
Received on Monday, 23 November 1998 18:18:59 UTC