- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 11:08:46 -0400 (EDT)
- To: graziani@iroe.iroe.fi.cnr.it (Paolo Graziani)
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
to follow up on what Paolo Graziani said: > Why not Bliss symbols? > > They represent a well organized language, with a univocal meaning, > easily translatable into any other language. Why not follow up with some sort of a link or citation for more information on this? Does anybody have a working translator _to_ Bliss from any natural language? Al I am reading "univocal" to mean "unequivocal" -- no?
Received on Thursday, 1 October 1998 11:09:24 UTC