- From: Bruce Bailey <bbailey@clark.net>
- Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 13:32:10 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- CC: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
Back on the 23rd I provided a link for more information about bliss: Persons interested in this should learn about Blissymbolics, a communication system originally Developed by Charles K. Bliss (1897-1985) for the purpose of international communication (think "League of Nations" and you will have an idea of how successful he was). Bliss has fewer than one hundred primitives that can be combined into thousands of words. Visit Blissymbolics Communication International for more information (http://home.istar.ca/~bci/). Al Gilman wrote: > to follow up on what Paolo Graziani said: > > > Why not Bliss symbols? > > > > They represent a well organized language, with a univocal meaning, > > easily translatable into any other language. > > Why not follow up with some sort of a link or citation for more > information on this? Does anybody have a working translator _to_ > Bliss from any natural language? > > Al > > I am reading "univocal" to mean "unequivocal" -- no?
Received on Thursday, 1 October 1998 13:30:10 UTC