- From: Paolo Graziani <graziani@iroe.iroe.fi.cnr.it>
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 16:34:30 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: Chris Kreussling <CHRIS.KREUSSLING@ny.frb.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Why not Bliss symbols? They represent a well organized language, with a univocal meaning, easily translatable into any other language. Paolo Graziani On Wed, 30 Sep 1998, Chris Kreussling wrote: > >>> <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> 09/25 9:57 PM (LK) >>> > ... [I] am amazed as to how much "intutition" is involved when face to face with a > person - The one thing, alas, that will ever be lacking on the internet. (Not > disregarding M.O.N.A. the Signing Avatar - but she's pretty scary looking!) ... > <<< > > The accessibility issues for Web standards and tools: What is a "language?" What are the possible means of communication? Current standards - such as the HTML LANG attribute - presume textual/legible or verbal/audible communication. Sign languages are communicated through visual, spatial and haptic (touch) means. > > As the speed of communications and image/graphics processing increase and prices decrease, visual communication and other mediums become more feasible. Literatures of sign languages - recorded speech - can be stored and communicated over the Web. Eventually, and soon, real-time sign language communication will become possible. Improvements in adaptive technologies also expand the options and responsibilities for authors and user agents (browsers). For example, I can think of no technological reason why someone who is both deaf and blind should not be able to use a haptic device, communicating by touch and force-feedback, to browse the Web. However, for this to work: > - Authors must be able to identify the source language, including sign languages > - User agents must recognize and support users' language preferences, including sign languages > - User agents must support transcription of the message through enabling technologies. > > Standards must not preclude these possibilities. Ideally, they should support and encourage their development. > > P.S.: Agreed, "Mona" is scary-looking! > > <author>Chris Kreussling</author> > <disclaimer>The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System.</disclaimer> > > > ****************************** Paolo Graziani Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Ricerca sulle Onde Elettromagnetiche "Nello Carrara" Via Panciatichi 64 I - 50127 Firenze tel +39 055 4235259, fax +39 055 4235204 E-mail: graziani@iroe.fi.cnr.it ******************************
Received on Thursday, 1 October 1998 10:35:03 UTC