- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charlesn@sunrise.srl.rmit.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 18:52:35 +1000 (EST)
- To: Taylor-Made <taymade@csinet.net>
- cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hey folks. Remember that Bobby is not perfect, but an attempt to automatically check your code. For that matter the guidelines are probably not perfect either. The difficulty here is that Bobby has in the past given 4 stars to inaccessible websites, and only one to very accessible ones. These things need to be tempered with a bit of old-fashioned rainpower to work as well as possible. I had a look at Richard's deafwatch front page ( http://www.deafwatch.com/ ), and thought that it was not too bad. Improvements could be made by removing MARQUEE as it is not an HTML element, giving IMAGES titles and longdesc/D-links as well as ALT text (more work, but hopefully it can be partially automated. My _personal_ feeling is that LONGDESC and a D-link should both be used, pointing to the same thing, that TITLE should provide the functional description of a resource and that ALT should attempt to capture whatever is most important in a few succinct words) and by using style sheets instead of hard-formatted styles. But so far as I can see there is nothing actually inaccessible about the page as it stands. (Any thoughts folks?) Charles McCathieNevile
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 1998 05:11:53 UTC