- From: Hakon Lie <howcome@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 11:27:49 +0100 (MET)
- To: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>
- Cc: WAI HC Working Group <w3c-wai-hc@w3.org>
Jason White writes: > CSS 2 will be of significant benefit in the development of a more > accessible web, since its widespread adoption will discourage authors from > abusing the HTML markup in ways that are detrimental to the creation of > braille and audio representations of a document. Indeed, this was one of the key motivations for starting the work on CSS. > More generally, I think there is an important strategic decision which the > WAI Formats and Protocols Working Group will soon be obliged to make, > namely, how far to push the development of CSS, or whether the needs of > accessibility would better be served by concentrating principally on other > style mechanisms, such as the XML style language, which will reputedly be > based on DSSSL. There are several XML style languages, including CSS and DSSSL. You're probably referring to XSL, the "eXtensible Style Language", which has proposed to W3C [1]. [1] http://www.w3.org/Submission/1997/13 > The ability to transform the structure of an HTML document by reorganising > its elements is an important aspect of any style mechanism that can > adequately meet the needs of braille and audio users. So far, there has > been no indication of an intention to include such tree transformation > properties in CSS This has been true in the past; CSS is intended for documents where tree transformations are not required. However, another recent submission to W3C builds on CSS to provide "Simple Tree Transformation Sheets". [2] http://www.w3.org/Submission/1997/16/ Regards, -h&kon H å k o n W i u m L i e howcome@w3.org http://www.w3.org/people/howcome World W i d e Web Consortium
Received on Monday, 10 November 1997 05:28:08 UTC