- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 23:39:48 -0500 (EST)
- To: JBrewer@w3.org (Judy Brewer)
- Cc: w3c-wai-hc@w3.org (HC team)
to follow up on what Judy Brewer said: > We had a heads-up that this might be coming through for quick review, and > yes, there is some time pressure on the HTML 4.0 spec and so Dan has had to > make a procedural determination here. > > In any case, I appreciate that the HC WG is already working > this issue over, and hope that with Jason's and other's > suggestions we will be able to come up with a solution that > addresses the concern that Dave has raised. I believe that reasonable accommodation requires reasonableness on both sides. What we decide now is a procedural choice as well. If this problem is an absolute show-stopper for access reasons, we need to tell the HTML group NOW. If it is marginal, we can still raise a concern after the PR goes out. As I understand it none of the suggestions about smart styling (adapting to quotes at the edges of the Q tag content) are new, compared to what has been considered by the HTML group. Attempts at smart styles will also result in some broken formatting. The depressing effect on Q tag usage will not be entirely removed by the specification provisions as stated in the October 17 draft. Dan didn't just rule on the procedure, he ruled on the substance. I personally believe he is mis-reading the subject RFC as saying what should be done when quotes _do_ appear, framing the rest of the Q tag content. I think it doesn't say. But that is not what we have been asked to decide. We need to decide whether the _access denial_ caused by this specification provision requires that we ask for reconsideration. Everybody please put on your thinking caps, not so much to re-craft the spec, but to try to evaluate the severity of the damage. Is it a serious _access_ issue? Or is it a style issue that Braille and audio users care about along with every one else -- maybe even a little more. In the latter case, it may not be appropriate to ask for immediate reconsideration by reason of inaccessibility. -- Al
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 1997 23:40:05 UTC