- From: Judy Brewer <JBrewer@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 02:36:01 -0400
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>, dd@w3.org, jmiller@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-wai-hc@w3.org (HC team)
Al, Daniel, Jim, Here's my draft preamble. I'll look for your feedback in the morning. I will be out of the office between 10 & about 1 EDT, so if we can finish this between 9 & 10am, great. - Judy DRAFT!!!! Subject: PROCESS AND TIMELINE FOR REVIEW OF HC WG DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS Dear IPO/WAI Interest Group participants: HC RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IG REVIEW COMING OUT TODAY: Today you will be receiving the draft recommendations of the HC Working Group on accessibility recommendations for inclusion in the HTML 4.0 and CSS2 specifications. These recommendations were developed under a tight timeline and with extensive discussion over the past several weeks by the HC WG members. FORMAT FOR REVIEW MATERIALS AND DISCUSSION: You will receive a brief overview of the draft recommendations, and thread-starters for discussion in four areas where the HC WG is particularly seeking review of their conclusions. In addition, comment is welcomed in any other areas you feel need clarification. Comment on which areas you consider most critical for accessibility will also be helpful. Please note that the discussion will occur on the IG list-serve, rather than being sent to the HC list, so expect an increased volume of mail for the coming week. The four thread-starters have symbolic names to help keep the discussions straight. Please use these naming conventions in your replies to facilitate dialog on the list-serve. The threads are: OPTION Making SELECT structures with lots of OPTIONs comprehensible TABLE Making TABLEs comprehensible DESC Text associated with images REF Associating HTML contents with external documents (and similar LINK and META extensions) There are also background readings for all the HC group's recommendations indexed in the web page with URL http://www.w3.org/WAI/group/HC/guide.html This guide contains a summary of the conclusions on a few other issues, including: Preserving the logical reading order of text Images used as list bullets Range of MEDIA values Controlling dynamic features TIMING FOR REVIEW: Because of HTML 4.0 deadlines, we will need to hand our recommendations to the HTML WG on October 22. The earlier we have your comments within this period, the more time the HC WG has to work with them. Comments received after this time will be extremely difficult to incorporate into the HTML 4.0 draft which goes to the W3C Member organizations for a review period prior to its eventual public release. NATURE OF PROPOSED RECOMMENDATIONS: Please bear in mind that the IPO/WAI draft recommendations which you will be reviewing are precisely that: draft recommendations, which after review will be proposed to HTML and CSS Working Groups of the World Wide Web Consortium. While we will be working to ensure that as many of these recommendations are accepted as possible, there is no guarantee that this proposal represents the final content of HTML 4.0 or CSS2. In some cases better ways to address these issues may emerge after discussion. We appreciate all IPO/WAI Interest Group participants treating the proposed recommendations with this sensitivity. Thank you in advance for your time reviewing this material. Regards, Judy Brewer Director, International Program Office Web Accessibility Initiative, W3C 617-258-9741 jbrewer@w3.org At 09:59 PM 10/15/97 -0400, Al Gilman wrote: >Judy, > >To keep the Interest Group from being inundated with messages, >why don't you just include the following fragment in your >introduction on process? Then we can fire off the four surviving >discussion-starters and we are on our way. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >You will shortly be receiving messages setting the stage for >discussion in four areas where we have questions and know that >the conclusions reached by the HC group should be reviewed. >These have symbolic names to help keep the discussion threads >straight. > >These areas are: > >OPTION Making SELECT structures with lots of OPTIONs comprehensible > >TABLE Making TABLEs comprehensible > >DESC Text associated with images > >REF Associating HTML contents with external documents > (and similar LINK and META extensions) > >There are background readings for all the HC group's recommendations >indexed in the web page with URL > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/group/HC/guide.html > >In addition to the four major areas listed above, this guide >contains a summary of the conclusions on a few other issues where >the results are less likely to stimulate discussion. Feel free >to discuss any issue you feel needs to be clarified. We are >priming the pump only in the above four areas. > >Issues written up in the guide but not represented in the four >topic areas above are: > > Preserving the logical reading order of text > Images used as list bullets > Range of MEDIA values > Controlling dynamic features > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >-- Al >
Received on Thursday, 16 October 1997 02:35:43 UTC