- From: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 16:52:06 +0200
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHVyjGOV3hzUhSgAcoqYkb4DKBa6Ft-JZfsFvitXV1CavLUfCA@mail.gmail.com>
Hey Alastair, Yes, that'll do the trick. Thank you! On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 2:48 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi Wilco, > > > > It was added quite a while ago (2021), but perhaps there’s a simple > addition to solve that? > > > > *User agent control:* The size of the target *and target offset* is > determined by the user agent and is not modified by the author; > > > > That allows for things like select-dropdowns where you can’t control the > size OR spacing, but keeps in scope things where you can control the > spacing around them. > > > > -Alastair > > > > > > *From: *Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> > *Date: *Thursday, 30 June 2022 at 13:14 > *To: *Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > *Cc: *WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: CFC - WCAG 2.2 Target Size (Min), Normative Text > > Hey Alastair, > > I think there's a flaw in the user agent exception. Something like radio > buttons and checkboxes often use the size determined by the user agent. As > written, this SC would suggest content authors are not responsible for how > far they space those apart, unless they've adjusted the size of them. That > doesn't sound right to me. > > > > I'm going to go -1 on this for now. Apologies for not spotting this > sooner. I'm not sure when the user agent exception got added but I clearly > hadn't looked at it carefully enough. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 6:49 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > wrote: > > Call For Consensus — ends Wednesday Monday July 4th at midday Boston time. > > > > The Working Group has previously discussed the WCAG 2.2 SC *Target Size > (Min) *and the *Normative text *needs to be approved by CFC. > > > > It can be previewed in the editor’s draft: > > https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#target-size-minimum > > > > The SC was last discussed in a meeting May 17th: > > https://www.w3.org/2022/05/17-ag-minutes#item07 > > > > The change history is here: > > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/target-size-minimum.html > > > > The survey is available here: > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-target-size-min/results > > > > The github issues are listed here: > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%222.5.8+Target+Size+%28Min%29%22+-label%3A%22Survey+-+Added%22 > > (There is 1 open, related to an understanding content update.) > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before > the CfC deadline. > > > > Kind regards, > > -Alastair > > -- > > > > @alastc / www.nomensa.com > > > > > > > -- > > *Wilco Fiers* > > Axe-core & Axe-linter product owner - WCAG 3 Project Manager - Facilitator > ACT Task Force > > > -- *Wilco Fiers* Axe-core & Axe-linter product owner - WCAG 3 Project Manager - Facilitator ACT Task Force
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: deque_logo_180p.gif
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2022 14:52:35 UTC