- From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 21:34:13 -0400
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEy-OxEibxZMra3LBuMuFdmFMgNzvhqVCZJBw6R114bMGsY0Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Alistair, I think ISO/IEC JTC1, in their Accessibility work did a black and white high contrast icons standard - it was several years back. You might try to look at that for ideas. On Tue, Jun 14, 2022, 5:34 AM Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > On 14/06/2022 10:12, Alistair Garrison wrote: > > > With this in mind, I wonder if the W3C might consider at some point the > creation of a style-guide for standard icons for standard functions > supporting standard user intents - possibly under Tutorials. Actually > saying in this style-guide what each standard icon should include e.g. that > a search icon should contain a visually recognisable magnifying glass > symbol; or a print icon should contain a visually recognisable printer > symbol. > > > > This suggestion is made with the best possible intention of trying to > unlock the true potential of 3.2.4 for users - so that they can rely on > consistent identification of at least some icons from website to website; > rather than simply from web page to web page within the same website. > > Just to clarify though, this would have to be an informative guide, not > something normative. I don't think WAI should be in the business of > deciding/policing which icons are "right" and which ones aren't, as it's > not some kind of design body/authority, and as with most visual aspects, > things can get extremely subjective and context-specific very fast. > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > >
Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2022 01:34:42 UTC