Re: CFC - Focus appearance (min) SC

Hi Alastair,

Yep, presumed as much - I was mostly dotting "i's" and crossing "t's".

JF

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 8:12 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Hi John,
>
>
>
> Yep, anything marked as “Editors note” (rather than “Note”) will be
> removed prior to CR. However, I think they are still relevant for another
> review period, so do expect to see them there for that.
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
> *Sent:* 07 April 2021 12:49
> *To:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: CFC - Focus appearance (min) SC
>
>
>
> Another conditional +1
>
> The current draft text seems to match the latest discussion, however the
> Editor's Note comment at the end will need to be removed from the final
> version upon publication. (Ya, standard stuff, but getting it on the
> record...)
>
>
>
> EDITOR'S NOTE
>
> The working group is interested in feedback about the minimum area metric,
> and if there are unusual scenarios where visible indicators are caught by
> the wording.
>
> JF
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:22 AM Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
> wrote:
>
> +1
> Detlev
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed the WCAG 2.2 success criteria “Focus
> Appearance (Minimum)”, the latest version can be seen here:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#focus-appearance-minimum
>
> --
>
> Detlev Fischer
>
> DIAS GmbH
>
> (Testkreis is now part of DIAS GmbH)
>
>
>
> Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45
>
>
>
> http://www.dias.de
>
> Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites
>
>