RE: CFC - Focus appearance (min) SC

Hi John,

Yep, anything marked as “Editors note” (rather than “Note”) will be removed prior to CR. However, I think they are still relevant for another review period, so do expect to see them there for that.

-Alastair


From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
Sent: 07 April 2021 12:49
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: CFC - Focus appearance (min) SC

Another conditional +1

The current draft text seems to match the latest discussion, however the Editor's Note comment at the end will need to be removed from the final version upon publication. (Ya, standard stuff, but getting it on the record...)

EDITOR'S NOTE

The working group is interested in feedback about the minimum area metric, and if there are unusual scenarios where visible indicators are caught by the wording.
JF

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:22 AM Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de<mailto:detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>> wrote:
+1
Detlev



The Working Group has discussed the WCAG 2.2 success criteria “Focus Appearance (Minimum)”, the latest version can be seen here:

https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#focus-appearance-minimum


--

Detlev Fischer

DIAS GmbH

(Testkreis is now part of DIAS GmbH)



Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45



http://www.dias.de


Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites