RE: CFC - Focus appearance (min) SC

+1

Thx,

ND


From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 1:27 PM
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] CFC - Focus appearance (min) SC
Importance: High


Call For Consensus - ends 9th April at noon Boston time.



The Working Group has discussed the WCAG 2.2 success criteria "Focus Appearance (Minimum)", the latest version can be seen here:

https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#focus-appearance-minimum<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fwcag%2Fguidelines%2F22%2F%23focus-appearance-minimum&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7Ca7a57a8621d14da8cc9008d8f93a65d5%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637533376505900113%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=QrHoQ3%2Bo7v7XPuvF5iFPN47ogvAsgKsfVRiFTeeWxj0%3D&reserved=0>



Survey of issues and responses:

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-focus-appearance-updates/results<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2Fwcag22-focus-appearance-updates%2Fresults&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7Ca7a57a8621d14da8cc9008d8f93a65d5%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637533376505910105%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=eMppIwkimwpBby%2F3WAYG8vC4rAi2mtX70QXlcfbgyxY%3D&reserved=0>



Previous minutes include:

https://www.w3.org/2021/04/06-ag-minutes.html#t01<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2021%2F04%2F06-ag-minutes.html%23t01&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7Ca7a57a8621d14da8cc9008d8f93a65d5%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637533376505910105%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=lNStVbPkuxKXkbIrnC5wmQWsIpMSM0bnJ6ssBl57QnU%3D&reserved=0>

https://www.w3.org/2021/02/16-ag-minutes.html#item05<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2021%2F02%2F16-ag-minutes.html%23item05&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7Ca7a57a8621d14da8cc9008d8f93a65d5%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637533376505920098%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=RJv0dMDmPTNq%2F%2F3Dgw%2BTAIteU%2BVJCX1HfRg3LkDEI2I%3D&reserved=0>

https://www.w3.org/2021/01/19-ag-minutes.html#t02<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2021%2F01%2F19-ag-minutes.html%23t02&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7Ca7a57a8621d14da8cc9008d8f93a65d5%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637533376505930096%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=c%2BzJ20fzZwwJLU90%2BWLugQYy4xaI7YRj6WmotaiwUS0%3D&reserved=0>



Note: We have discussed an alternative size measure, but agreed to raise an issue during the next review period.



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you "not being able to live with" this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nomensa.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7Ca7a57a8621d14da8cc9008d8f93a65d5%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637533376505930096%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=sqd0uncANrokflUUI36KeZYJh5n1ye8c8w7bzbYZtPQ%3D&reserved=0>