-1 Please add the "minimum bounding box" definition.
I do have additional concerns but will raise them during the review period.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:27 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:
> Call For Consensus — ends 9th April at noon Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed the WCAG 2.2 success criteria “Focus
> Appearance (Minimum)”, the latest version can be seen here:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#focus-appearance-minimum
>
>
>
> Survey of issues and responses:
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-focus-appearance-updates/results
>
>
>
> Previous minutes include:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2021/04/06-ag-minutes.html#t01
>
> https://www.w3.org/2021/02/16-ag-minutes.html#item05
>
> https://www.w3.org/2021/01/19-ag-minutes.html#t02
>
>
>
> Note: We have discussed an alternative size measure, but agreed to raise
> an issue during the next review period.
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>
--
*Wilco Fiers*
Axe-core product owner - Facilitator ACT Task Force - Co-chair ACT-Rules
