- From: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 10:48:38 -0700
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <OF2FAD6197.603D034F-ON8825859E.006184DA-8825859E.0061D689@notes.na.collabserv.c>
How about putting the adverb in the middle for the AAA? A: 2.47 Focus Visible AA: 2.4.11 Focus Visible (Enhanced) AAA: 2.4.xx Focus Highly Visible Michael Gower Senior Consultant in Accessibility IBM Design 1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC V8T 5C3 gowerm@ca.ibm.com cellular: (250) 661-0098 * fax: (250) 220-8034 From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Date: 2020/07/07 07:21 AM Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Focus visible, plus? How about: * Level A: 2.4.7 Focus visible * Level AA: 2.4.11 Focus visible (Minimum) [since this is the new minimum, essentially encompassing 2.4.7] * Level AAA: 2.4.xx Focus visible (Enhanced) Or: * Level A: 2.4.7 Focus visible * Level AA: 2.4.11 Focus appearance (Minimum) [since this is the new minimum, essentially encompassing 2.4.7] * Level AAA: 2.4.xx Focus appearance (Enhanced) Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Head of Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_awkawk&d=DwIGaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=_9rqR3xSCWQUlv9VpOcJwkP7H0XWQXmxeMmqQl6Fikc&m=tZ0_JIizKvRHLrIT74CVlW7yyo1ZTCzsP4CSjOkhU0M&s=55ZmAmMXR9aofS8KCi8YB5OlzKwWf_Q3Cd2zJimADsg&e= On 7/2/20, 1:24 PM, "Jonathan Avila" <jon.avila@levelaccess.com> wrote: As an FFYI SC 1.4.3 which is Level AA is labeled Contrast (Minimum). Jon -----Original Message----- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 1:20 PM To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>; WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: RE: Focus visible, plus? CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Laura, > I agree with John that the real minimum is Level A. Fair enough, good to have a fresh view! I'm unsure about "median" for the new AA criterion, but I also can't think of anything along those lines that feels right. Modifying the name of 2.4.7 is something I had veered away from, but it might be the neatest thing, e.g: * Level A: 2.4.7 Focus visible (Minimum) * Level AA: 2.4.11 Focus visible * Level AAA: 2.4.xx Focus visible (Enhanced) Floating that, but wondering if there will be howls of complaint about changing a 2.0 SC name...? (Or Michael might say it will break the spec?!) My backup suggestion is: * Level A: 2.4.7 Focus visible * Level AA: 2.4.11 Focus visible (Contrast) * Level AAA: 2.4.xx Focus visible (Enhanced) The reasoning being that the new criteria brings in a contrast requirement, and the AAA one enhances that. Cheers, -Alastair
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2020 17:49:03 UTC