- From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:24:16 +0000
- To: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
As an FFYI SC 1.4.3 which is Level AA is labeled Contrast (Minimum). Jon -----Original Message----- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 1:20 PM To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>; WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: RE: Focus visible, plus? CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Laura, > I agree with John that the real minimum is Level A. Fair enough, good to have a fresh view! I'm unsure about "median" for the new AA criterion, but I also can't think of anything along those lines that feels right. Modifying the name of 2.4.7 is something I had veered away from, but it might be the neatest thing, e.g: * Level A: 2.4.7 Focus visible (Minimum) * Level AA: 2.4.11 Focus visible * Level AAA: 2.4.xx Focus visible (Enhanced) Floating that, but wondering if there will be howls of complaint about changing a 2.0 SC name...? (Or Michael might say it will break the spec?!) My backup suggestion is: * Level A: 2.4.7 Focus visible * Level AA: 2.4.11 Focus visible (Contrast) * Level AAA: 2.4.xx Focus visible (Enhanced) The reasoning being that the new criteria brings in a contrast requirement, and the AAA one enhances that. Cheers, -Alastair
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2020 17:24:32 UTC