- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:20:20 +0000
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Laura, > I agree with John that the real minimum is Level A. Fair enough, good to have a fresh view! I'm unsure about "median" for the new AA criterion, but I also can't think of anything along those lines that feels right. Modifying the name of 2.4.7 is something I had veered away from, but it might be the neatest thing, e.g: * Level A: 2.4.7 Focus visible (Minimum) * Level AA: 2.4.11 Focus visible * Level AAA: 2.4.xx Focus visible (Enhanced) Floating that, but wondering if there will be howls of complaint about changing a 2.0 SC name...? (Or Michael might say it will break the spec?!) My backup suggestion is: * Level A: 2.4.7 Focus visible * Level AA: 2.4.11 Focus visible (Contrast) * Level AAA: 2.4.xx Focus visible (Enhanced) The reasoning being that the new criteria brings in a contrast requirement, and the AAA one enhances that. Cheers, -Alastair
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2020 17:20:35 UTC