- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 18:21:16 +0000
- To: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
- CC: WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AM7PR09MB4167F00376BFF998A81BC0B5B9030@AM7PR09MB4167.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Wilco, > I noticed 2.4.7 was changed from Level AA to Level A. I apologies if I missed the conversation on this That was from last summer, it isn’t a recent thing. It started from quite an active thread which you were involved in: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2019JulSep/0002.html We then had various options outlined in this survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/updating-wcag2-requirements/results And then agreed on a call: https://www.w3.org/2019/07/16-ag-minutes.html#item02 And then agreed to publish with that change: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2020JanMar/0000.html The SC text for the WCAG 2.0 SC is not changing, it is just moving up a level. If you would like to re-open that issue I think a github issue would be a suitable place to register that. > The "success criterion" (and "guideline") text was removed from the headings. That’s odd, I hadn’t noticed. I don’t think that is intentional, I’ll check with Michael. > In 1.4.13 the word "Dismissable" was changed to "Dismissible". Similar to my first comment, a change like that should in my opinion be done in an errata, not in a new working draft. It is an errata from 2.1: https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/errata/#editorial That is why it is showing up in 2.2. (So the real question is why doesn’t that show up in 2.1, to which I’d have to dig into a W3C policy thing.) Does that mitigate your concerns? Kind regards, -Alastair
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2020 18:21:23 UTC