Hi everyone,
Michael Gower introduced a variation on the survey question, which was to add a (different) 4th bullet aimed at preventing the sticky heading/footer issue.
I'd like to get the group's opinion whether that solves the problem with three examples.
Given the current SC text:
https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/wcag22-focus-visible-enh-updates/understanding/22/focus-visible-enhanced.html
Add the bullet:
"Unobscured: The item with focus is not entirely hidden by author-created content"
(Notice this bullet applies to the element, the previous bullets apply to the focus indicator.)
And consider three scenarios, which of these pass/fail?
1. A link (and its focus indicator) that is completely hidden by a sticky footer as you tab down.
2. A link (and its focus indicator) that is partially hidden by a sticky footer as you tab down.
3. A focus indicator is that is hidden by it's wrapper, permanently so scrolling is not a factor.
For the last scenario, I included that as part of the test page here:
https://alastairc.uk/tests/wcag22-examples/sticky-footer4.html
And a screenshot of the partially hidden focus indicator:
[Two images, one has an outer border along 2 sides.]
Answers to the pass/fail on the 3 scenarios would be very helpful in resolving this...
Kind regards,
-Alastair
--
www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com/> / @alastc
