Re: Editorial formatting (was CFC - Add Findable Help to WCAG 2.2 draft)

Jonathan, with apologies,

> I also understand that this CfC  Text has not passed,

JF

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:46 PM Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
wrote:

>
>    - I also understand that this CfC has not passed, so this proposed SC
>    is being put aside for now as we race toward our publishing deadlines for
>    WCAG 2.2
>
>
>
> Do I understand correctly that pulling this CFC means this criterion would
> not be in WCAG 2.2?
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> *From:* John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 17, 2020 4:58 PM
> *To:* Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>;
> public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Editorial formatting (was CFC - Add Findable Help to WCAG 2.2
> draft)
>
>
>
> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Putting aside the subject of this CfC for a minute, as I was looking at
> this another thing struck me: the originally proposed opening sentence was
> difficult for me to parse. Being a big fan of the Hemingway App, I went
> over there and gave it a whirl.
>
> The originally proposed text* in github:
>
>
>
> [alt: screen capture of the GitHub page showing the new "diff" addition of
> text]
>
>
>
> HTML stripped and pasted into Hemingway App:
>
> [alt: screen capture of the text pasted into the HemingwayApp Editor. It
> also shows a reading score of "Post-graduate"]
>
>
>
> As I suspected, the "readability" score of that sentence was determined to
> be "Post-graduate". Ouch.
>
>
>
> Then I tried a bit of reformatting  of that text, like so:
>
>
>
> *For single page apps or any set of web pages with blocks of content that
> are repeated on multiple web pages:*
>
> * * if one of the following is available, *
>
> * * then at least one of the following is included or linked in a
> consistent location.*
>
>
>
> [alt: screen capture of the reformatted text pasted into the HemingwayApp
> Editor. It now shows a reading score of "Grade 6"]
>
> Now, I recognize that not everyone agrees that "reading score" has a value
> for all users with cognitive disabilities, but it also strikes me that with
> some simple formatting we can make our requirements and proposed
> requirements easier to read for everyone, and I think at some point we may
> have lost sight of that here.
>
>
>
> I also understand that this CfC has not passed, so this proposed SC is
> being put aside for now as we race toward our publishing deadlines for WCAG
> 2.2. None-the-less, I encourage us all to try and remember to try and say
> things simply and clearly, and to check not only the substance of our work,
> but also when required, the presentation of our work.
>
>
>
> Thanks all!
>
>
>
> JF
>
>
>
> * the text proposed: For single page apps or any set of web pages with
> blocks of content that are repeated on multiple web pages, if one of the
> following is available, then at least one of the following is included or
> linked in a consistent location:
>
>
> --
> John Foliot | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC Representative
>
> Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good
> deque.com
>
> "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." -
> Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
*​John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC Representative
Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good
deque.com
"I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." -
Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"