RE: Error correction and "steps"

Hi Jon,

From my understanding:

> If the user can go back one screen at a time to review the steps is that acceptable?

Yes, that's where the SC started from. I think the understanding doc is needed to fill that concept in because it is allowed by the SC text, but not phrased in that way due to the difficulty in defining 'steps'.


> Does this address the situation where the user can go back and forth in steps until they reach a final screen that has a cancel or submit button?

Whether you need to go back and forth, or you edit on the final 'confirmation' screen is flexible from an author point of view, but yes.


> Can restarting the process by canceling or closing out if data is not lost be a way to meet this?

If you cancel out of the process I think that goes out of scope. Within the scope you need the ability to go back and edit things within the process. I guess if cancelling = going back to the first part of the process, then yes, but it seems a stretch.

HTH,

-Alastair