Re: Focus Visible Enhanced: greater than or equal to a 1 CSS pixel border

Hi Alastair,

Does "perimeter" make it more clear?

Cheers

Op do 11 jun. 2020 om 12:38 schreef Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com
>:

> > "No, the border is the border. The circumference is the circumference.
> The length of the border is the circumference. But in CSS you describe the
> thickness of the border, so the perimeter is irrelevant."
>
>
>
> Hi Jake,
>
>
>
> I might be tired today, I think I need some more translation!
>
>
>
> If you say circumference (and least in the UK, and via google
> <https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=define%3Acircumference>),
> that implies it is a circle, but I don’t think that’s what you mean?
>
>
>
> So I think this is an issue of ‘any border’ verses a ‘complete border’,
> correct?
>
>
>
> If so, the current text is:
>
> “The focus indication area is greater than or equal to a 1 CSS pixel
> border of the focused control."
>
>
>
> To me, saying “a border” means complete border, but if that causes
> translation issues or confusion, I’d suggest:
>
> “The focus indication area is greater than or equal to a 1 CSS pixel
> border of the focused control’s perimeter."
>
>
>
> Or could we explain that in the understanding? No one else had interpreted
> it that way that I’m aware of.
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>