Re: CFC - ACT errata item #2

+1

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 4:18 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> *From:* Chuck Adams <charles.adams@oracle.com>
> *Sent:* 21 May 2020 16:00
> *To:* w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> *Subject:* CFC - ACT errata item #2
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Tuesday, May 26th at 11am Boston time.
>
>
>
> The ACT Task Force would like to propose an editorial update to the ACT
> Rules Format.  The update makes an editorial change to the definition of
> “Accessibility requirement”.
>
>
>
> The proposed change can be viewed at the following link:
> https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/wcag-act/450/627e269...d74f86a.html#accessibility-requirement
>
>
>
> The chairs brought this up in the AGWG meeting on 5/19/2020.   The chairs
> believe that the scope of this change is editorial, and we need approval to
> publish the update.
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position and feel that
> those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision,
> please let the group know before the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Charles Adams
>
>
>


-- 
Rachael Montgomery, PhD
Director, Accessible Community
rachael@accessiblecommunity.org

"I will paint this day with laughter;
I will frame this night in song."
 - Og Mandino