- From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 21:09:47 -0400
- To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
- Cc: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>, David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, WCAG Editors <team-wcag-editors@w3.org>, David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com>
- Message-ID: <CAEy-OxHuJGreSLZQBzXz5yjgNDcrJFtmsiMrw6tA+4tijWTcnA@mail.gmail.com>
I like it David! On Tue, May 5, 2020, 4:58 PM Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com> wrote: > While I know we want to be sensitive – we honestly don’t know if it was > unintentional or not. One company I can think of has an inaccessible > pizza ordering app but yet claims there are alternatives such as calling on > the phone. I’ve seen sites that purposely removed the keyboard focus > because they thought it was ugly and annoying to users. > > > > Jonathan > > > > *From:* John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 5, 2020 4:51 PM > *To:* David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com> > *Cc:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>; WCAG > Editors <team-wcag-editors@w3.org>; David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com> > *Subject:* Another Attempt (was: Sentence in COGA Note) > > > > *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know > the content is safe. > > > > How about instead: > > > > ""People with cognitive and learning disabilities may be negatively > impacted and unintentionally blocked from effectively using some web > content due to certain design and content choices." > > > > JF > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:15 PM David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com> > wrote: > > Hi all > > > > on the call today there was quite a lively discussion around this sentence. > > > > CURRENT > > "People with cognitive and learning disabilities may not be able to > effectively use web content because of the design and content choices of > the author." > > I've gone back and tried to capture the essence of Lisa's rationale, while > steering the focus to the design/content and rather than the author. I also > used John Avila's word "impact" rather than "because". > > > > SUGGESTED > Design and content choices can impact the content in ways that make it > difficult or impossible for some users with cognitive and learning > disabilities to use this content. > > > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Mobile: 613.806.9005 > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > > * Including those with disabilities* > > > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > > > > > -- > > *John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC Representative > Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good > deque.com > > "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." - > Pascal > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2020 01:10:11 UTC