- From: David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:52:30 -0400
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDanXrYY7xU_K+z1=buYAUCjNLERKipQ=x+9fLm7GxZZCw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all In our last meeting about Visual Indicators, there was concern over the definition of Process in WCAG, and that it might be interpreted to broadly to address any link etc... In order to try to move the SC ahead I'm proposing a scope adjustment to b=make it clear to authors what they would be responsible for in this SC. I borrowed from 3.3.4 language about financial and legal commitments. "For critical controls needed to progress or complete a process <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-processes> that causes legal commitments <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-legal-commitments> or financial transactions for the user, ..." This would cover any purchasing processes, or legal processes, which I think is the vast majority of cases we were thinking of when rescoping to a "process", and it clarifies that the edge cases brought up in the meeting are not in scope. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Mobile: 613.806.9005 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
Received on Thursday, 23 April 2020 15:52:58 UTC