- From: Schnabel, Stefan <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:48:12 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> That's the point of UAAG, not WCAG. I also mentioned that, too. Also that https://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG20/ are discontinued since end of 2015 and the WG is inactive since. It was just for the sake of clarity. We both get the point now, I think. Is the Silver charter different from that or does it have the same scope or are there subtle differences? Regards Stefan -----Original Message----- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 11:27 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: Plugins as SC - thread was: Visual Indicators On 20/04/2020 09:58, Schnabel, Stefan wrote: > And please allow me a last comment: Saying "browsers won't implement that, therefore you can and have to use external tools" removes all the pressure from the browser vendors. Like saying to kids "You don't need to learn to swim, there are boats". Just picking up on this point to say, once again, that the point of WCAG is not to pressure browser vendors into doing anything. That's the point of UAAG, not WCAG. P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Monday, 20 April 2020 09:48:29 UTC