- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 16:16:10 +0000
- To: "Korn, Peter" <pkorn@lab126.com>, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, Bruce Bailey <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>
- CC: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <32B59C4B-7376-43AE-9948-BF5E57AC2990@adobe.com>
Agree with Peter. If I created a PDF portfolio comprised of several PDF documents in one PDF wrapper, or published a set of PDF documents in a web directory then that would be a “set” Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Head of Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk From: "Korn, Peter" <pkorn@lab126.com> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 12:13 PM To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Bruce Bailey <Bailey@Access-Board.gov> Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: Re: Collections of web pages Alastair, all, Just a reminder, WCAG2ICT tackled this problem for non-web documents & non-web programs, and that approach may be helpful. See set of documents (non-web) (as used in WCAG2ICT)<https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#keyterms_set-of-documents> and set of software programs (as used in WCAG2ICT).<https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2ict/#keyterms_set-of-software> Regards, Peter -- Peter Korn | Director, Accessibility | Amazon Lab126 pkorn@amazon.com From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 8:42 AM To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Bruce Bailey <Bailey@Access-Board.gov> Cc: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Collections of web pages Resent-From: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Resent-Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 8:42 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Andrew, Bruce & everyone, During the discussion of two criteria (at least), the concept of “set of web pages” came up as a key point. · Findable help: Including ‘set of web pages’ helps to scope-out the very simple one-page websites and PDFs that are less likely to have human contact details. · Fixed reference points: It says “a web page or set of web pages" so that it covers ePub and non-ePub files . Andrew mentioned that long PDFs could be considered a ‘set of web pages’, and that some PDFs techniques mention that. As far as I can tell from our definition for a web page<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-web-page-s> and set of web pages<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-set-of-web-pages>, all of these would be considered a ‘web page’ as they are located at a single URI: · A PDF; · An ePub document; · A ‘single page app’, unless it adjusts the URI & browser history to appear to have multiple pages. I can’t see a reference to ‘set of web pages’ in the PDF techniques<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/pdf#PDF2>, the closest is PDF2 but that doesn’t seem to reference the definition directly. Can anyone see an issue with the uses of “set of web pages” in these two SCs? Kind regards, -Alastair -- www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com/> / @alastc
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2020 16:16:31 UTC