- From: Newton, Brooks (TR Product) <Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 18:50:08 +0000
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- CC: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <SN6PR03MB45119578955F5C7CF698D4CE846C0@SN6PR03MB4511.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Hello, My apologies, I believe I need to clarify my position in this Focus Visible (enh) update thread. I agree with Sailesh and think that it is better to approach this as a user agent issue and it is not best handled as a content author issue, when the content author has not provided custom focus indication. So -1 to Focus visible (enh) as it is written and +1 to Sailesh’s statements. Brooks From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 1:28 PM To: Newton, Brooks (TR Product) <Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com> Cc: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>; Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>; Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: Focus visible (enh) update +1 Although it feels a bit awkward to require hundreds of thousands of developers and designers to tweak websites, when a plugin like stylus on the user side seems to do quite well. But I can live with the SC understanding that lots of people aren't technical enough to use that type of AT yet, and there are some limits to plugins. Cheers, David MacDonald CanAdapt Solutions Inc. Tel: 613-806-9005 LinkedIn <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_davidmacdonald100&d=DwMFaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLmy8-1Cr1I4FWIvbLFebwKgY&r=W3VUihr49D2x8upR4FtjMIsy0FSGEnqb4ghTiQJMtRw&m=AV-qZXeb0BEgfUinGXkd46Q1-m0JWDkreV4aL6_kNyw&s=EbcJepmCIM0IsgppWVyvPGCfLgzLkKSnxi3wKDvDUWg&e=> twitter.com/davidmacd<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_davidmacd&d=DwMFaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLmy8-1Cr1I4FWIvbLFebwKgY&r=W3VUihr49D2x8upR4FtjMIsy0FSGEnqb4ghTiQJMtRw&m=AV-qZXeb0BEgfUinGXkd46Q1-m0JWDkreV4aL6_kNyw&s=3pNWDMV31DFaSzfraJ6aenlUu4Kf3RJFwZ_G5gvialQ&e=> GitHub<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_DavidMacDonald&d=DwMFaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLmy8-1Cr1I4FWIvbLFebwKgY&r=W3VUihr49D2x8upR4FtjMIsy0FSGEnqb4ghTiQJMtRw&m=AV-qZXeb0BEgfUinGXkd46Q1-m0JWDkreV4aL6_kNyw&s=nAn-FoRIz1ptKshPbOR-MPaBAkrVONI-TO9t-vFp4q4&e=> www.Can-Adapt.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.can-2Dadapt.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLmy8-1Cr1I4FWIvbLFebwKgY&r=W3VUihr49D2x8upR4FtjMIsy0FSGEnqb4ghTiQJMtRw&m=AV-qZXeb0BEgfUinGXkd46Q1-m0JWDkreV4aL6_kNyw&s=4VfnsDRzBNYF8w5a5u4qkO2WRKeUVAJoJLiyVqUwXfY&e=> Adapting the web to all users Including those with disabilities If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.davidmacd.com_disclaimer.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLmy8-1Cr1I4FWIvbLFebwKgY&r=W3VUihr49D2x8upR4FtjMIsy0FSGEnqb4ghTiQJMtRw&m=AV-qZXeb0BEgfUinGXkd46Q1-m0JWDkreV4aL6_kNyw&s=6ve6H-BsXpNy71W6yZHMGPQVQcpDQ7Cwd82OxpLmfVM&e=> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 2:02 PM Newton, Brooks (TR Product) <Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com<mailto:Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com>> wrote: +1 -----Original Message----- From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com<mailto:sailesh.panchang@deque.com>> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 12:47 PM To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>> Cc: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de<mailto:detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>>; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: Re: Focus visible (enh) update Alastair, Reference your statements this morning: <start> In most cases if you are using a complete outline around the component it makes no difference at all, and you’d automatically fulfil it. The one area I found that might surprise people is that the default (in Firefox) 1px dotted outline would not pass in most cases. It is not a new thing that browser default indicators would fail, on the Mac the default indicators for some browsers fail the contrast requirement already. </end> Given this, is it reasonable to ask designers and developers around the world to include markup / styling that will correct issues that should really be addressed by the browser? Maybe browser makers should be urged to improve the default focus indicator area and contrast issues that are noted as accessibility concerns. And then if developers override those introducing accessibility barriers, those should be flagged to their attention as content-accessibility problems: much like when developers suppress default focus indicators. Another example: the HTML5 placeholder attribute when first implemented posed contrast problems. True, developers were urged to remedy this but it was taken up with browser makers who fixed it at their end. Best wishes, -- Sailesh Panchang Principal Accessibility Consultant Deque Systems Inc 381 Elden Street, Suite 2000, Herndon, VA 20170 Mobile: 571-344-1765
Received on Friday, 18 October 2019 18:51:02 UTC