- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 17:05:48 +0000
- To: WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <E3B1E370-6041-4044-A1A6-1016879235FB@nomensa.com>
> when line-wrapping introduces additional line-breaks, *THEN* it impacts the formatted meaning, I don’t think it is that binary, there are mitigations, like there are with code samples. Starting with your Haiku example, if you assume that this symbol represented a linebreak: § (I can’t see how to insert a line break symbol, just pretend!) The summer river: § although there is a bridge, my horse § goes through the water. § (The email version of this has light grey shading on the top & bottom sentences, that will be lost for some email clients and in the archive.) I’m not saying that should be the default view, but it is a technique that could be used to maintain the meaning created by the formatting. There is a continuum here: * Most text shouldn’t use a pre or have a fixed-width (i.e. standard text that reflows now). * For some types of text it makes sense to have in a pre, but it should wrap fairly easily. * For some types of text it makes sense to have in a pre, but it could wrap with great difficulty. * Some text could only work in a fixed-format (definitely essential). Let’s start with sufficient techniques at the top-end of that, and work down until it gets too difficult to be practical. It was (and still is) a good idea to gather some examples though, the more the better. -Alastair
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2019 17:06:11 UTC