Re: What to work on next

This is an active time for Silver, and I expect that we will be asking 
for AGWG agenda time at least monthly to show AGWG what Silver is 
working on and get your input.  We can work together, but keep the main 
AGWG focus on the 2.1 Techniques.  I expect that the Silver time in AGWG 
meetings will increase toward the end of the summer when we have refined 
prototypes to show and user testing results.

There are a number of small group and individual proposals being 
developed, and AGWG members are very welcome to contribute their ideas 
or to participate in them.  You do not need to add another conference 
call, as the Silver conference calls right now are mostly coordination 
calls. The actual work is mostly happening asynchronously in the:

  * Github Silver repo https://github.com/w3c/silver
  * Silver Google Drive
    https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19-9CE4c14vDZYheaKoriz-TjYl2rreiJ.


Please feel free to contribute your ideas  -- keeping in mind that 
Silver is lower priority than the 2.1 Techniques.  I don't want the 
Chairs to think I am distracting you all from the high priority work!  ;)

jeanne


On 7/10/2018 6:36 PM, Alastair Campbell wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> Not disagreeing, but just to add emphasis to your own points:
>
> > This incubation work is lower priority than the primary deliverable (WCAG 2.1).
>
>
> “Incubation” does mean no official deliverable (until re-chartering). 
> We could get it pretty much ready, re-charter and go through the 
> publishing process, but that is a ways off.
>
> > Once we get the understanding and technique documents for 2.1 in reasonable shape
>
> Let’s not underestimate this! It would really help to have some focus 
> on this for the next couple of months, I’ve had questions already 
> along the lines of “when are the techniques coming?”
>
> >Once we get the understanding and technique documents for 2.1 in 
> reasonable shape I think we should focus over on Silver for several 
> months before the end of this charter.
>
> That is certainly an option on the table, we’ll pick up the decision 
> process shortly.
>
> As I said the factors on my mind are:
>
>   * How many potential SCs could we have for  a 2.2?
>   * How long will it take to get Silver ready as an equivalent spec.
>
> There are probably other factors, but as suggested previously, let’s 
> agree the requirements as the starting point.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Alastair
>