Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not?

Katie wrote:
> but the SC text would need to change.

In what way? This changes only the handle:

Auto-complete: The meaning of each input field collecting information about the user can be programmatically determined when: (Level AA)

  *   The input field has a meaning that maps to the HTML 5.2 Autofill field names; and
  *   The content is implemented using technologies with support for identifying the expected meaning for form input data.

That is the requirement, it doesn’t talk about the rational.

> Also all the support information around it needs to address that this is an SC about user memory cognitive impairments.

Agreed, the understanding doc is very out of date, I can help with that.

> Additionally, if this change were to happen, it needs to be moved to be under Guideline 3.3: Input Assistance.

I also agree with that, hopefully that’s an editorial change?



Received on Friday, 23 February 2018 16:16:20 UTC