Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not?

The context of use and necessity of this SC is very different - and
therefore this should be rethought with that user context in mind.

At the very least 'the meaning of' should be removed from the stem.

The text of the SC should reflect the intention of the requirement - that
is, to assist users in populating commonly used form input data.

On Feb 23, 2018 11:15 AM, "Alastair Campbell" <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote:

> Katie wrote:
>
> > but the SC text would need to change.
>
>
>
> In what way? This changes only the handle:
>
>
>
> *Auto-complete*: The meaning of each input field collecting information
> about the user can be programmatically determined when: (Level AA)
>
>
>
>    - The input field has a meaning that maps to the *HTML 5.2 Autofill
>    field names*; and
>    - The content is implemented using technologies with support for
>    identifying the expected meaning for form input data.
>
>
>
> That is the requirement, it doesn’t talk about the rational.
>
>
>
>
>
> > Also all the support information around it needs to address that this
> is an SC about user memory cognitive impairments.
>
>
>
> Agreed, the understanding doc is very out of date, I can help with that.
>
>
>
>
>
> > Additionally, if this change were to happen, it needs to be moved to be
> under Guideline 3.3: Input Assistance.
>
>
>
> I also agree with that, hopefully that’s an editorial change?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>