Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions)

+1
Slight concern about the motion animation definition including the phrase 
"does not include changes of color" since from one perspective, every 
motion effect is to some degree achieved with a change of colour on many 
screen pixels at the same time. But I think this can be dealt with 
editorially.

Michael Gower
IBM Accessibility
Research

1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC  V8T 5C3
gowerm@ca.ibm.com
voice: (250) 220-1146 * cel: (250) 661-0098 *  fax: (250) 220-8034



From:   Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
To:     WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Date:   2018-01-17 06:24 PM
Subject:        CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 
2.2.9  Animation from Interactions)



Call For Consensus — ends Friday January 19th at 9:00pm Boston time.
 
The Working Group has discussed responses to the following issue:
697: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/697)
 
Response to Issue 697: 
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#697

 
Changes to the Animation from Interaction SC and definition are here: 
https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/738

The Changes can be viewed here: 
http://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/animation-from-interactions/guidelines/index.html#animation-from-interactions 

 
If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not 
been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not 
being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before 
the CfC deadline.
 
Thanks,
AWK
 
Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe 
 
akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk