RE: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions)

+1, with a slight concern about whether “can be disabled” should be treated as equivalent to “a mechanism is available to disable” (i.e., the mechanism may be supplied in the content or in the user agent, for example). Using the conventional WCAG “mechanism” phrase in the text of the SC would have made this clearer.

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 9:23 PM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions)
Importance: High

Call For Consensus — ends Friday January 19th at 9:00pm Boston time.

The Working Group has discussed responses to the following issue:
697: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/697)

Response to Issue 697: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#697<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FDraft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues%23697&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C9c74c88e9fe34b3abd0408d55e1aab2b%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636518391003672267&sdata=LFxmzNC57SUf9WmLdbtcN8iRh0hXl6s%2BZDNDTl3CfOE%3D&reserved=0>

Changes to the Animation from Interaction SC and definition are here: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/738<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fpull%2F738&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C9c74c88e9fe34b3abd0408d55e1aab2b%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636518391003672267&sdata=44%2FUfOFojw1LID3BJAcD8HwUI8aQ0gzoqjXBPCPsxcw%3D&reserved=0>
The Changes can be viewed here: http://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/animation-from-interactions/guidelines/index.html#animation-from-interactions<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fanimation-from-interactions%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html%23animation-from-interactions&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C9c74c88e9fe34b3abd0408d55e1aab2b%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636518391003672267&sdata=Y1%2BMVLU8kNUmKrGba6o0TOvVU9HvhRlOR3Hbq6QJvgg%3D&reserved=0>

If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0>



________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________