- From: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:50:58 -0800
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <OF9F22BD50.5023738A-ON8825821A.000E0A9C-8825821A.000FA545@notes.na.collabserv.c>
+1 I believe the response to Karl Grove's points in 649 could include a reference to 1.4.1 Use of Color. If the only means of distinguishing the states of a control was through differences in colour, then arguably those colour differences would have to meet 3:1 in order to satisfy 1.4.1. Although not perfectly applicable, there is precedent established for this kind of consideration in the technique and explanation in G183: Using a contrast ratio of 3:1 with surrounding text and providing additional visual cues on focus for links or controls where color alone is used to identify them And of course changes in colour for a control is not the only means of indicating changes in state -- focus indictors and other outline effects are just one possible alternative. Michael Gower IBM Accessibility Research 1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC V8T 5C3 gowerm@ca.ibm.com voice: (250) 220-1146 * cel: (250) 661-0098 * fax: (250) 220-8034 From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Date: 2018-01-17 06:38 PM Subject: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast Call For Consensus — ends Friday January 19th at 9pm Boston time. The Working Group has discussed responses to the following issues: 649: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/649) 616: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/616) 411: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/411) 282: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/282) 680: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/680) 686: (https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/686) Response to Issue 649: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#649 Response to Issue 616: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#616 Response to Issue 411: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#411 Response to Issue 282: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#282 Response to Issue 680: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#680 Response to Issue 686: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Draft_Responses_to_Dec_WD_Issues#686 The changes to the SC are implemented in this pull request: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/742 The changed SC can be viewed here: http://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/graphics-contrast/guidelines/index.html#non-text-contrast If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk
Received on Friday, 19 January 2018 02:51:31 UTC