-1 to both... agree that we are scrambling on it and it's a little bit of a Frankenstein SC. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:44 AM, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> wrote: > -1 to both, with a note that +1's Joshue's comment. > > One advantage of the aggressive publishing cycle being imposed by the W3C > (aka roughly every 18 months +/-) means that we can shelve this for 2.1, > and continue working on it in 2.2 - we've broken the "all-or-nothing" > update approach. If it isn't ready now, it isn't ready now, and that's OK > (well, at least understandable), we can continue to keep working on it. > Meanwhile, regulators and legislators can use whichever version they choose > to point to, and/or develop legislative language that stays in step with > the rapid advances that technology imposes. > > JF > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Joshue O Connor - InterAccess < > josh@interaccess.ie> wrote: > >> White, Jason J wrote: >> >> +1 to Katie’s comments. I am particularly concerned by the trade-off >> that favours timeliness over quality, >> >> Just for the record *no-one* is trading timelines over quality - we just >> happen to be out of time. >> >> -- >> Joshue O Connor >> Director | InterAccess.ie >> > > > > -- > John Foliot > Principal Accessibility Strategist > Deque Systems Inc. > john.foliot@deque.com > > Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion >
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2018 17:25:28 UTC